ANGELLICA GRANT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A judgment and sentence will be affirmed despite a scrivener's error in the statutory citation, with remand for correction of that error.
[1] A scrivener's error in the statutory citation within a judgment does not render the judgment invalid; correction on remand is the appropriate remedy.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGrant was charged with violating section 827.03(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2019). The trial court's judgment mistakenly cited the conviction as occurrin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Brief cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Following the filing of an Anders1 brief by appellate counsel, Appellant, Angellica Grant, appeals pro se her judgment and sentence. We affirm but remand for the correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment. Grant was charged with violating section 827.03(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2019). The judgment indicates that she was convicted under section “827.03(B).” The correct citation should be section 827.03(2)(b). AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. BOATWRIGHT, KILBANE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.