MATTHIAS MORROW
v.
JOHN WESTLY MORROW
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A handwritten will that is executed in compliance with section 732.502(1), Florida Statutes—including signatures of the testator, two attesting witnesses, and a notary with notary seal—does not facially violate the Florida Probate Code and may not be struck without an evidentiary hearing.
[1] A handwritten will that bears the testator's signature, signatures of at least two attesting witnesses, and a notary signature with notary seal, executed in compliance wi…
[2] A handwritten will executed in accordance with the requirements of section 732.502(1), Florida Statutes, is not considered a holographic will under section 732.502(2) and…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMatthias Morrow appealed the trial court's order striking the purported last will and testament of Bunny Lee Morrow. The will was handwritten and bore…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Will Execution Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
UPON CONFESSION OF ERROR
In these adversarial probate proceedings, appellant, Matthias Morrow,
challenges an order striking the purported last will and testament of the decedent, Bunny Lee Morrow, as violative of section 732.502, Florida
Statutes (2018). On appeal, appellant contends the trial court erred in striking the document without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. Upon appellee’s commendable confession of error and our own independent review of the record, we reverse. Although the will was handwritten, it reflected the signatures of the testator, two witnesses, and a notary, along with a notary seal. § 732.502(1), Fla. Stat. (“Every will must be in writing and executed as follows: . . . The testator must sign the will at the end . . . . The testator’s . . . [s]igning, or . . . [a]cknowledgment . . . [t]hat he or she has previously signed the will . . . must be in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses . . . . The attesting witnesses must sign the will in the presence of the testator and in the presence of each other.”); § 732.502(2), Fla. Stat. (“A will in the testator’s handwriting that has been executed in accordance with subsection (1) shall not be considered a holographic will.”). Consequently,
it did not facially violate the Florida Probate Code. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
2