JACKSON ALEXANDER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's order denying postconviction relief and warned that further abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings concerning the same case may result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filings and referral to prison officials.
[1] Repeated filings asserting identical or similar claims arising from the same criminal case may be deemed abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, subjecting the appe…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“any further pro se filings in this court asserting claims stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 2016-CF-0063-A may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time”
Court's warning to appellant regarding future filings
Jackson Alexander, a pro se appellant in a criminal case from Seminole County, appealed from the circuit court's denial of his postconviction relief m…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This court previously affirmed the trial court’s order(s) denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 2016-CF-0063-A. Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this court asserting claims stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 2016-CF-0063-A may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).
APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.