GALYN SCOTT HOEFT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order revoking probation must be entered in written form stating the specific conditions that were violated.
[1] An order revoking probation must be entered in writing and must specify the particular conditions that the trial court found to have been violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“order revoking probation must state in writing conditions which trial court found to have been violated”
Citation to Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
Galyn Scott Hoeft appealed four conviction judgments and sentences from the County Court for Citrus County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences entered
below but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation in Case No.
2022-MM-111. See Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
(holding that order revoking probation must state in writing conditions which
trial court found to have been violated).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of a written order revoking probation.
EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marshall v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…See State v. Wagner, 863 So. 2d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 2004); see also Davis v. State, 239 So. 3d 202 (Fla. 5th ---PAGE 3--- revoking probation must state in writing the conditions the trial court found a defendant to have violated. See Hoeft v. State, 351 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Font v. State, 299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020); cf. Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (applying same principle to revocation of community control). Accordingly, we remand this matter for entry of an appro…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)