MARC PULEO
v.
ERIC A. JACOBS

Fla. 3d DCA | 2022-11-30
No. 22-0516
Elam
374 So. 3d 86 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2022) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Vorbeck v. Betancourt, 107 So. 3d 1142, 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“[T]he failure to raise an issue regarding an improper dismissal with prejudice at the trial level constitutes a waiver of this issue on appeal.”); K.R. Exch. Servs., Inc. v. Fuerst, Humphrey, Ittleman, PL, 48 So. 3d 889, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (concluding that general allegations that the client’s attorneys “had a duty to perform the legal services with the diligence and level of care expected of similarly-situated attorneys in South Florida” failed to “sufficiently allege ultimate facts relating to . . . which duties were breached”); Bankers Tr. Realty, Inc. v. Kluger, 672 So. 2d 897, 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (recognizing that a claim for legal malpractice must allege ultimate facts “that support a causal connection between the acts the attorneys committed and the alleged damages suffered by the [client]”).

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Puleo v. Cohen (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
    …ston Defendants and filed a voluntary dismissal. 2 Puleo dismissed several defendants after he filed suit. His claims against his own attorneys, Eric A. Jacobs and Eric A. Jacobs, P.A., were dismissed and affirmed on appeal. See Puleo v. Jacobs, 374 So. 3d 86 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). He voluntarily dismissed his appeals against Caterina Gomez and Gomez, LLC, after he filed the notice of appeal here. ---PAGE 5--- Applying the same rationale, the trial court granted summary judgment on the remaining conspir…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw