MARIA J. LLERENA-MOLINA
v.
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., ETC.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2022-11-23
No. 22-0422
Ferguson, Latimer, Quinn
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2022)


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Arsali v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 121 So. 3d 511, 519 (Fla. 2013) (“[J]udgments pertaining to set asides of judicial foreclosure sales are now, as they always have been, subject to review by way of an abuse of discretion standard”); Venezia v. Wells Fargo Bank, 306 So. 3d 1096, 1097- 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“[T]he law is well-established that an objection to a foreclosure sale must be directed toward conduct that occurred at, or was directly related to, the foreclosure sale”) (citing IndyMac Fed. Bank FSB v. Hagan, 104 So. 3d 1232, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Florida case law is clear that the substance of an objection to a foreclosure sale under section 45.031(5) must be directed toward conduct that occurred at, or which related to, the foreclosure sale itself”).

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw