ADELE FREDEL, APPELLANT,
v.
IRWIN F. FREDEL, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the divorce decree and the awards of custody, child support, attorney's fees, and equitable interest.
Wife appeals a final divorce decree granting her husband a divorce, awarding her custody, child support, attorney's fees, and an equitable interest in…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Custody Of Minor Children cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant was defendant and counter-claimant in a divorce action brought by her husband. She appeals a final decree granting a divorce to her husband, awarding her custody of the children, child support, attorney’s fees and an equitable interest in the husband’s estate.
Two points are presented on appeal, the first of which questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree of divorce and the second urges that appellant was not granted her full equitable interest in her former husband’s estate. The husband cross-assigns the award of custody of the children, the award of counsel’s fees, and the granting of an equitable interest in his estate to his former wife.
The divorce is affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071, 138 So. 796, 82 A.L.R. 537, and Benson v. Benson, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 748. No error has been made to appear in the award of the custody of the children, or in the allowance made to the appellant.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. Condra, 255 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)…RNEST E., Associate Judge, concur. . Frazier v. Frazier, 109 Fla. 164, 147 So. 464 (Fla.1933) ; Garner v. Garner, 193 So. 2d 673 (Fla. DCA 2d, 1967), and eases cited therein. . Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. DCA 3d, 1964). . Udell v. Udell, 151 So. 2d 863 (Fla. DCA 2d, 1963). . Foster v. Sharpe, 114 So. 2d 373 (Fla. DCA 3d, 1959).…
-
Lowrey v. LEE, 873 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…es’ minor child. We affirm. Appellate courts are reluctant to reverse orders concerning child custody because we recognize that the trial judge is better positioned to determine factual issues relating to child custody matters. See Udell v. Udell, 151 So. 2d 863, 865 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). Since the credibility of witnesses and the weight of their testimony is best determined by the trial court, factual findings made by trial judges in child custody cases should be accorded great weight. Kern v. Kern, 333 So.…
-
Nixon v. Nixon, 209 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…o. 2d 584. . Belford v. Belford, 159 Fla. 547, 32 So. 2d 312 (1947); Hoffman v. Linley, Fla. App.1967, 201 So. 2d 638; Garner v. Garner, Fla.App.1967, 193 So. 2d 673. . Pollack v. Pollak, Fla.App.1967, 196 So. 2d 771; Udell v. Udell, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 863. . Nixon v. Nixon, Fla.App.1967, 200 So. 2d 263.…
Authorities Cited
- Holmes v. The Atl. Nat'l Bank of Jacksonville, 103 Fla. 1071 (Fla. 1932)
- Rosalind E. Heath v. Heath, 103 Fla. 1071 (Fla. 1932)
- Benson v. Benson, 102 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)