H. KYLE FLETCHER, ESQUIRE
v.
DOUGLAS ARTHUR KEEGAN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's order is affirmed.
[1] An affirmance of a circuit court order does not preclude the appellee from pursuing all appropriate remedies, including against the appellant.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis is an appeal from a circuit court decision in Orange County involving parties H. Kyle Fletcher and Douglas Arthur Keegan, both proceeding pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Decision filed July 12, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Leticia J. Marques, Judge.
H. Kyle Fletcher, Jr., of Fletcher Law Firm, P.A., Oviedo, pro se.
Douglas Arthur Keegan, Sanford, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J., and EISNAUGLE, J., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs specially, with opinion.
EDWARDS, J., concurring specially. 5D21-1845 LT Case No. 2014-CP-002772 I concur in affirming the underlying order but do so without prejudice for Appellee to pursue all appropriate remedies, including against Appellant.