MICHAEL E. ZAPETIS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE CITY NATIONAL BANK OF CORAL GABLES, A UNITED STATES CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Rock Indus., Inc. v. United Bldg. Sys., Inc., 408 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …s to be regarded as conditional because anything can change with further questions and even further attorney contemplation, all of which may continue up until that terminal moment when the jury is sworn. Saborit, citing Funland Park, Inc. v. Dozier, 151 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. discharged and petition dismissed, 157 So. 2d 815 (Fla.1963), and var [*632] ious other appellate cases, held that the denial to a litigant of peremptory challenges to which he is entitled constitutes reversible error. In Brown…
• Saborit v. Worthy Deliford, 312 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
  …been a harmless error, where the panel that was then sworn decided the case adversely to the plaintiffs. Denial to a litigant of peremptory challenges to which he is entitled constitutes reversible error. Funland Park, Inc. v. Dozier, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 460. Further, the jury charge complained of by the appellants was inappropriate on the evidence, under §§ 627.727, 627.731 and 627.732(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. When one received injuries which result from a collision with a pickup or panel truck used prim…
• ST. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Welsh, 501 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …that amount in excess of the Welshes’ policy limits. Therefore, the trial court erred in granting the Welshes and the Bustillos a total of nine challenges while granting only three peremptory challenges to St. Paul. See Funland Park, Inc. v. Dozier, 151 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. discharged, 157 So. 2d 815 (Fla.1963). Furthermore, this error in allotting peremptory challenges is grounds for reversal. The Florida Supreme Court has recently stated that “[t]he right to the unfettered exercise of peremptory…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• State ex rel. King Merritt v. The Honorable David J. Heffernan, 142 Fla. 496 (Fla. 1940)