VALERY LAVRIK
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OBO LUBOV LAVRIK
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court errs when it finds a parent in contempt for failure to pay child support without making statutory findings regarding the parent's ability to pay the purge amount.
[1] A trial court must make findings regarding an obligor's ability to pay a purge amount before finding the obligor in contempt for failure to pay child support.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the trial court erred in failing to make findings regarding the father's ability to pay the purge amount”
DOR's basis for confessing error in contempt proceeding
A father was found in contempt by the trial court for failing to pay child support. The Department of Revenue brought an Amended Motion for Contempt.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Contempt For Failure To Pay Child Support cases and more on FLexlaw
[ April 20, 2022 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Sarah Willis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014DR011639XXXXNB.
Troy William Klein of the Law Office of Troy W. Klein, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
CONFESSION OF ERROR MAY, J.
A father appeals an order on the Department of Revenue’s [DOR’s] Amended Motion for Contempt which found him in contempt for failing to pay child support. He argues the trial court erred in failing to make statutorily required findings. The DOR filed a Confession of Error. In the Confession of Error, the DOR agrees the trial court erred in failing to make findings regarding the father’s ability to pay the purge amount. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). We therefore reverse and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and Remanded. CONNER, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Eugenia Bowen & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985)