PALM GARDEN OF AVENTURA, LLC, ETC.
v.
SCHKETHA ELLISON, ETC.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2022-03-02
No. 21-1449
Oppido
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2022) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An agent's acts standing alone are insufficient to establish that the agent is authorized to act for the principal, and the decision to enter into an arbitration agreement is not a health care decision that may be made by a proxy for an incapacitated patient.


Headnotes

[1] Under Florida law, an arbitration agreement is not a health care decision that may be made by a proxy for an incapacitated patient pursuant to §§ 765.401 and 765.101(6),…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The acts of the agent, standing alone, are insufficient to establish that the agent is authorized to act for the principal.”

Court's foundational principle on agent authorization

Facts & Procedural History

Palm Garden of Aventura sought to enforce an arbitration agreement allegedly entered into by a proxy on behalf of an incapacitated patient, Schketha E…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Stalley v. Transitional Hosps. Corp. of Tampa, 44 So. 3d 627, 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“The acts of the agent, standing alone, are insufficient to establish that the agent is authorized to act for the principal.”);

§ 765.401, Fla. Stat. (2020) (explaining that “health care decisions may be made for [an incapacitated] patient by” a proxy); § 765.101(6), Fla. Stat. (2020) (enumerating which decisions are considered “health care decisions”

and not including the decision to enter into an arbitration agreement).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw