JULIO SANTIEXPOSITO
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Post-conviction relief claims that could have been raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred.
[1] Post-conviction relief claims based on grounds that either were or could have been raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJulio Santiexposito appealed a post-conviction relief denial in a criminal matter from Miami-Dade County Circuit Court.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Procedural Bar cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed February 2, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________ No. 3D21-1424 Lower Tribunal No. F16-3147 ________________
Julio Santiexposito,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge. Julio Santiexposito, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. HENDON, J.
The issues raised by the defendant are procedurally barred as they should have and could have been raised on direct appeal, see Byrd v. State, 597 So. 2d 252, 254 (Fla.1992) (holding that post-conviction relief cannot be based on grounds which either were or could have been raised on direct appeal); Morejon v. Moore, 738 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (same), or are conclusively refuted by the record, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)
- Milford Wade Byrd v. State, 597 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1992)
- Sessions v. State, 738 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)