DAMAGE SERVICES, INC. A/A/O MEZA CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC.
v.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Reasonable emergency measures expenses cannot be paid pursuant to Coverage A provisions of an insurance policy and are subject to a reimbursement cap that cannot be exceeded without prior written approval from the insurer.
[1] Reasonable emergency measures expenses under a homeowners insurance policy are not payable pursuant to Coverage A provisions and are subject to a reimbursement cap that c…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“reimbursement cap on reasonable emergency measures expenses 'could not be exceeded without a request to, and prior approval from, the insurer'”
Court cited Certified Priority Restoration v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. to establish the binding limitation on emergency measures reimbursement
Damage Services, acting on behalf of Meza Capital Investment, sought coverage for reasonable emergency measures expenses under a Citizens Property Ins…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Policy Provisions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Damage Servs., Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 4D21-604, 2021 WL 4762555, at *1 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 13, 2021) (reasonable emergency measures expenses could not be paid pursuant to Coverage A provisions of policy); Certified Priority Restoration v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 324 So. 3d 5, 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reimbursement cap on reasonable emergency measures expenses “could not be exceeded without a request to, and prior approval from, the insurer”) (emphasis added). CIKLIN, ARTAU, JJ., and HARPER, BRADLEY, Associate Judge, concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Total Care Restoration, LLC v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)