JOSEPH CORDARO
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The validity of a license suspension is not rendered moot by the expiration of the suspension during appellate proceedings, and further proceedings are required.
[1] The expiration of a license suspension during the pendency of appellate proceedings does not render the suspension moot or eliminate the need for further proceedings on t…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In Gordon v. State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 166 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), this Court rejected the argument that the validity of a license suspension is moot and that further proceedings are not required where the suspension expires during the pendency of the appellate proceedings.”
The court's explanation for why the circuit court properly denied the mootness argument
Cordaro sought second-tier certiorari review of a circuit court order that quashed her license suspension and remanded the case for a further hearing.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Binding Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks second-tier certiorari review of a circuit court order quashing her license suspension and remanding for a further hearing. In Gordon v. State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 166 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), this Court rejected the argument that the validity of a license suspension is moot and that further proceedings are not required where the suspension expires during the pendency of the appellate proceedings. The circuit court followed binding precedent from this Court and did not depart from the essential requirements of law. We deny the petition and certify conflict with McLaughlin v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 128 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
Petition denied. Conflict certified.
WARNER, KLINGENSMITH, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McLAUGHLIN v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 128 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)