ELISEO MARTINEZ
v.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The cost of matching continuous flooring is not included as part of the actual cash value calculation under section 627.7011, Florida Statutes, and the plain language of the insurance policy.
[1] Under section 627.7011, Florida Statutes, and the plain language of a homeowners insurance policy, the cost of matching continuous flooring is not included as part of the…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMartinez held a homeowners insurance policy with Citizens Property Insurance Corporation and made a claim involving damage to continuous flooring.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Judgment Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Vazquez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 304 So. 3d 1280, 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (holding that the cost of matching continuous flooring is not “included as part of the actual cash value calculation” under section 627.7011, Florida Statutes, and the plain language of the insurance policy); see also Bifulco v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 693 So. 2d 707, 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“Merely attaching documents which are not ‘sworn to or certified’ to a motion for summary judgment does not, without more, satisfy the procedural strictures inherent in Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(e).”);
Pangilinan v. Broward Cty., 914 So. 2d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (en banc) (“[A] trial court does not abuse its discretion in determining that a counter-affidavit presented for the first time on rehearing of a summary judgment is too late.” (internal quotations and citation omitted)).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bifulco v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 693 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Pangilinan v. Broward Cnty., 914 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)