EVELYN KURLAND
v.
THE HAMILTON LAW FIRM, PL, ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court abuses its discretion by denying a stay of proceedings when substantially similar parties and substantially similar issues are involved in an earlier-filed action.
[1] A trial court abuses its discretion by denying a stay of proceedings when an earlier-filed action involves substantially similar parties and substantially similar issues.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because we find that this action involves both substantially similar parties and substantially similar issues as are involved in the earlier-filed action, we grant the petition for certiorari and quash the trial court's order denying a stay of proceedings.”
Court's reasoning for quashing the order, citing Sorena v. Gerald J. Tobin, P.A.
Evelyn Kurland, a defendant in a Miami-Dade County action brought by The Hamilton Law Firm regarding legal fees, moved to transfer venue to Broward Co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Stay Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed May 19, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-0485 Lower Tribunal No. 20-12061
________________
Evelyn Kurland,
Appellant,
vs.
The Hamilton Law Firm, PL, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Lopez, Judge. Ross & Girten, and Lauri Waldman Ross; Moraitis & Raimondi, LLP, and Robert J. Moraitis, and Peter M. Raimondi (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant. Dorta & Ortega P.A., and Omar Ortega and Natalie A. Ferral, for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.
2
Evelyn Kurland, appellant/defendant below, appeals an order denying her motion to transfer venue to the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County under principles of priority or on the basis of a forum selection clause in the retainer agreement between the parties. The order also denied her motion to stay the proceedings pending disposition of the charging lien filed in the Broward action by the Hamilton Law Firm, appellee/plaintiff below. Without reaching either the issue regarding whether this action should be transferred to Broward or the enforceability of the forum selection clause, on the undisputed facts of this case, we treat the appeal of the order denying the motion to stay as a petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order. See Sorena v. Gerald J. Tobin, P.A., 47 So. 3d 875, 876 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“Because we find that this action involves both substantially similar parties and substantially similar issues as are involved in the earlier-filed action, we grant the petition for certiorari and quash the trial court's order denying a stay of proceedings.”).