ADDARRYLL DORSEY JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a firearm and attempted felony murder and sentenced to twenty years and life imprisonment respectively under Florida's 10-20-Life statute. The court affirmed the life sentence for attempted felony murder but reversed the twenty-year sentence for aggravated assault after the state conceded error that the statute had been amended to remove aggravated assault from enumerated offenses before the crime occurred.
The court affirmed the life sentence for attempted felony murder, holding that Graham and Miller principles do not extend to adults and that mandatory life sentences for nonhomicide offenses do not violate the Eighth Amendment. The court reversed the twenty-year sentence for aggravated assault because the statute had been amended to remove aggravated assault from enumerated offenses before appellant's offense, making the maximum allowable sentence five years.
[1] The principles established in Graham v. …
[2] When a sentencing statute is amended to remove a specific offense from its enumerated list after the effective date of the amendment but before the offense was committed,…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The prohibition against cruel or unusual punishment, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, shall be construed in conformity with decisions of the United States Supreme Court which interpret the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment provided in the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
Citation to Article I, Section 17 of the Florida Constitution regarding interpretation of Eighth Amendment protections
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a firearm, attempted felony murder, and other offenses. The trial court sentenced appellant to twen…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Harmelin V. Michigan cases and more on FLexlaw
LEVINE, C.J. Appellant was convicted of several offenses, including aggravated assault with a firearm and attempted felony murder. The trial court sentenced appellant to twenty years for the aggravated assault under section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (2016), also known as the 10-20-Life statute, and designated him a prison releasee reoffender. As to the attempted felony murder conviction, the trial court sentenced appellant to life imprisonment pursuant to the 10-20-Life statute.
Appellant argues that his mandatory life sentence for a nonhomicide offense violates the Eighth Amendment and asks this court to extend the principles of Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), to a twenty-year old adult. We decline to do so. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 994-96 (1991) (rejecting argument that mandatory life sentence without parole for possessing more than 650 grams of cocaine violated Eighth Amendment); Art. I, § 17, Fla. Const. (“The prohibition against cruel or unusual punishment, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, shall be construed in conformity with decisions of the United States Supreme Court which interpret the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment provided in the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”); Jean-Michel v. State, 96 So. 3d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (rejecting argument that life sentences for nonhomicide crimes were unconstitutional pursuant to Graham because appellant was an adult at the time of the offenses). Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s sentence for attempted felony murder. Appellant also argues that his twenty-year sentence is illegal because an amendment to the 10-20-Life statute removed aggravated assault from the enumerated offenses before appellant committed the offense. The state correctly concedes error. Without a sentencing enhancement under the 10-20-Life statute, the maximum sentence for aggravated assault is five years in prison. §§ 784.021, 775.082(3)(e), Fla. Stat. Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence appellant for aggravated assault without applying the mandatory minimum sentence provisions of section 775.087(2). State v. Perez, 449 So. 2d 818, 818 (Fla. 1984).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2012)
- Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (U.S. 1991)
- State v. Perez, 449 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1984)
- Jean-Michel v. State, 96 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)