ADOLFO PEREZ SR.
v.
ADOLFO PEREZ JR.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2021-03-03
No. 20-1352
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A court that appoints a receiver may, at its discretion, make such further orders as are necessary and proper for the protection of the property and interests concerned during the pendency of the action.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court has discretionary authority to make further orders as necessary and proper for the protection of property and interests during the pendency of a receivershi…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the court making the appointment [of a receiver] may, at its discretion, during the pendency of the action make such further orders as are necessary and proper for the protection of the property and interests concerned.”

Abramson v. Brant, 141 So. 2d 777, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)

Facts & Procedural History

Adolfo Perez Sr. appealed a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County concerning a receiver appointment.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Abramson v. Brant, 141 So. 2d 777, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962) (“[T]he court making the appointment [of a receiver] may, at its discretion, during the pendency of the action make such further orders as are necessary and proper for the protection of the property and interests concerned.”); Puma Enters. Corp. v. Vitale, 566 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (affirming, under an abuse of discretion standard, the trial court’s ex parte order expanding the scope of an existing receivership to include an assignee of assets subject to the initial receivership).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw