CHRISTIAN LOZANO
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AND DIANA LOZANO

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-02-10
No. 20-0292
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An administrative child support order affirmed on appeal where the appellant's brief raises no issue of merit, with preservation of the appellant's rights to seek modification or a superseding order through statutory remedies.


Headnotes

[1] An administrative child support order may be affirmed on appeal without prejudice to the obligor's subsequent right to seek modification under section 409.2563(12), Flori…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Christian Lozano appealed pro se a final administrative child support support order rendered by the Department of Revenue.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Christian Lozano, appeals pro se the final administrative support order rendered by the appellee, the Department of Revenue. The appellant’s brief does not raise any issue with merit. Thus, we affirm the support order without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020). See Feliciano v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf’t, 305 So. 3d 801, 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Affirmed without prejudice. WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw