VME GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ETC.
v.
THE GRAND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A motion to disqualify a trial judge must be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting grounds for disqualification, and late filing is fatal to such a motion even if the underlying facts would establish bias.
[1] A motion to disqualify a judge must be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion.
[2] A motion to disqualify a judge must contain an averment regarding when the grounds for disqualification were discovered.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“While these allegations give rise to an objectively reasonable fear of bias or prejudice requiring disqualification of the trial judge, we are compelled to deny the petition for writ of prohibition because the motion to disqualify the trial judge was not timely filed.”
Court's explanation of why denial was required despite potential merits
VME Group International filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge in September 2020 based on documented activity occurring in August 2018, without …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reasonable Time For Filing cases and more on FLexlaw
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition. Law Offices of Karen J. Haas, and Karen J. Haas, for petitioners. Roniel Rodriguez, IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez, IV; Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole, for respondents. Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
VME Group International, LLC files a petition for writ of prohibition, seeking review of the trial court’s order denying VME’s motion for disqualification of the trial judge.
The petition is based upon documented activity occurring in August of 2018.
The motion to disqualify was filed in September of 2020. Neither the motion nor its attachments contain any averment or allegation regarding when these facts were discovered, nor any averment or allegation (save for a conclusory statement) that the motion was filed in a timely manner. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (providing:
“A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion . . . ”). See State v. Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (stating: “While these allegations give rise to an objectively reasonable fear of bias or prejudice requiring disqualification of the trial judge, we are compelled to deny the petition for writ of prohibition because the motion to disqualify the trial judge was not timely filed.”)
Although we are compelled to deny the petition, we note that the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration permit a judge to enter an order of disqualification on her own initiative. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i) (providing: “Judge’s Initiative.
Nothing in this rule limits the judge’s authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge’s own initiative”); Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1163.
Petition denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Octavio Oliu, 183 So. 3d 1161 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
- P.R. v. State, 183 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)