W. E. CAMPBELL, ET AL.,
v.
H. H. VICTORY
W. E. CAMPBELL, ET AL.,
H. H. VICTORY
118 Fla. 714
Florida Supreme Court (1935)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 160 So. 195
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appeal here is from final decree in favor of complainant in a foreclosure suit.
The correctness of the decree depends upon whether or not the decree is supported by the evidence. The evidence was conflicting. The conflicts were resolved by the Chancellor in favor of complainant, appellee here. We cannot find basis in the record to support the conclusion that the Chancellor was clearly wrong, and therefore, the decree should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rubin v. Kapell, 105 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)…picion, but that is all. The Supreme Court of Florida has held that a final decree of foreclosure supported by substantial evidence should not be reversed unless clearly erroneous. Meredith v. Carter, 111 Fla. 148, 149 So. 408; Campbell v. Victory, 118 Fla. 714, 160 So. 195, 196. In this case the Court says: “The correctness of the decree depends upon whether or not the decree is supported by the evidence. The evidence was conflicting. The conflicts were resolved by the chancellor in favor of complainant,…