DANIEL STAHL AND LORENA STAHL
v.
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The lower court's judgment in the mortgage foreclosure action was affirmed.
[1] During the suspension of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) by administrative order, the requirement that the clerk issue a writ of possession 'forthwith' remains s…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDaniel and Lorena Stahl were parties to a mortgage foreclosure action against Bank of New York Mellon. The case proceeded through the trial court to a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Executive Order 20-94 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Affirmed.1 LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and BOKOR, ALEXANDER, Associate Judge, concur. * * * 1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-94 (suspending and tolling any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law for 45 days from April 2, 2020). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our mandate.