GABRIEL LAMONT DIXON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed.
Gabriel Lamont Dixon appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. The opinion does not specify the underlying facts or charges.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge.
Gabriel Lamont Dixon, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Jackson v. State, 18 So. 3d 1016 (Fla. 2009); Mungin v.
State, 689 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 1995); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA
2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002);
Gwong v. State, 567 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Hillman v. State, 410 So. 2d 180
(Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Lopez v. State, 833 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
VILLANTI, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Jackson v. State, 18 So. 3d 1016 (Fla. 2009)
- Mungin v. State, 689 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 1995)
- Hillman v. State, 410 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
- Edgardo Lopez v. State, 833 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)