DEREK D. DURANT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's judgment was affirmed.
Derek D. Durant appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Lee County. The precise factual background is not detailed in this per curiam affirm…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge. Derek D. Durant, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- McDONALD v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
- Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
- Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)