ROBERT LEE SMITH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2019-10-17
No. 18-2218
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A conviction for unlawful sexual activity with certain minors must be reversed where it is subsumed in a conviction for sexual battery.


Headnotes

[1] When one criminal conviction is legally subsumed within another, the lesser conviction must be reversed to avoid double jeopardy violations, while the greater conviction…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“When an appellate court determines that dual convictions are impermissible, the appellate court should reverse the lesser offense conviction and affirm the greater.”

Court cited State v. Shelley in explaining the appropriate remedy for subsumed convictions

Facts & Procedural History

Robert Lee Smith was convicted of sexual battery and unlawful sexual activity with certain minors. The State conceded that the latter count was subsum…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

October 17, 2019 PER CURIAM.

Robert Lee Smith, who was convicted of one count of sexual battery and one count of unlawful sexual activity with certain minors, claims these dual convictions violate double jeopardy because the latter count is subsumed in the former. The State agrees and concedes error. As such, we reverse and remand with instructions that Smith’s conviction and sentence as to the unlawful sexual activity with certain minors count be vacated. See State v. Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914, 919-20 (Fla. 2015) (“When an appellate court determines that dual convictions are impermissible, the appellate court should reverse the lesser offense conviction and affirm the greater.”).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

2

RAY, C.J., and MAKAR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw