LEROY DAVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
# LEGAL BRIEF **Case:** Leroy Davis v. State of Florida, No. 4D19-618 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 18, 2019) **Holding:** The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's denial of Davis's motion to vacate his sentence under Miller v. Alabama and Graham v. Florida, finding that his sentence was not illegal under current Florida law and that the circuit court properly denied relief where no initial order granting resentencing had been entered.
[1] A circuit court lacks jurisdiction to reconsider an earlier order granting resentencing after the time for appeal has passed.
[2] A circuit court is not required to resentence a defendant when it has not previously entered an order granting resentencing.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Change In Law cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
LEROY DAVIS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D19-618
[September 18, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara A. McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 82-004054CF10B.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
No brief filed for appellee. KUNTZ, J. Leroy Davis appeals an order denying his motion to vacate sentence based on Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). The issue presented in this case is similar to the issue addressed in this Court’s opinion of Jones v. State, No. 4D18-3589 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 18, 2019), also released today. In Jones, the defendant moved for resentencing based on Miller and Graham. Jones, slip op. at 1. After the circuit court granted the motion and ordered resentencing, the State did not seek rehearing or appeal. Id. at 2. But after a change in the law, see, e.g., Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018); State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the State changed its position and objected to resentencing. Jones, slip op. at 2. The circuit court agreed with the State and vacated the order granting resentencing. Id. But because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to reconsider the earlier order granting resentencing, we quashed the order on appeal and remanded with instructions to resentence the defendant to a lawful sentence. Id.
2
This case is distinguishable from Jones in a significant way. In this case, the circuit court did not enter an order granting the motion for resentencing. Because it had not ordered resentencing, there was no final order for the State to appeal. And, because there was no final order granting resentencing, the court was not required to resentence the defendant.
Finally, we agree with the circuit court on the merits that the defendant’s sentence was not illegal. See State v. Wesby, 262 So. 3d 818, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (citing Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1240–41; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 3).
Affirmed. WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2012)
- State v. Budry Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018)
- State v. Wesby, 262 So. 3d 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)