JOHN MARSHALL
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2019-08-08
No. 18-3471
Loken, Gruender, Shepherd
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court must render a written order adjudicating a defendant competent to proceed when it has found competency, even if it has already made an oral pronouncement.


Headnotes

[1] When a trial court finds a defendant competent to proceed, it must enter a written order adjudicating competency consistent with its oral findings, even nunc pro tunc if…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“reverse and remand for the trial court to render a written order adjudicating Appellant competent to proceed, nunc pro tunc, consistent with its oral findings”

Court's remedy for the trial court's failure to issue a written competency order

Facts & Procedural History

John Marshall appealed the trial court's failure to issue a written order finding him competent to proceed after the court had orally pronounced him c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

pronouncing Appellant competent to proceed at the conclusion of his competency hearing.1 The State properly concedes error. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to render a written order adjudicating Appellant competent to proceed, nunc pro tunc, consistent with its oral findings. See Merriell v. State, 169 So. 3d 1287, 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

REVERSED and REMANDED. ORFINGER, EDWARDS, and EISNAUGLE, Associate Judges, concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________ Kevin Alvarez, of Law Office of Kevin Alvarez P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Footnotes
1 Appellant does not argue that the trial court failed to make an independent competency determination.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw