THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE CERTIFICATES, FIRST HORIZON MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATE SERIES FHAMS
v.
ONE SEAGROVE PLACE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., RICHARD W. SNEED, INWOOD INVESTMENTS, LLC, STEPHEN G. KYNIO, AND STEPHEN

Fla. 1st DCA | 2019-07-22
No. 18-1482
Schroeder, Tashima, Smith
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Bank of New York Mellon appealed the trial court's denial of its motion to vacate a foreclosure judgment entered by One Seagrove Place Owners Association. The Bank argued the judgment was void due to lack of personal jurisdiction based on improper service of process. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order denying the motion because the Bank failed to provide a transcript of the evidentiary hearing.


Holding

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order denying the motion to vacate the foreclosure judgment because the Bank failed to provide a transcript of the evidentiary hearing, requiring the court to presume the trial court's denial was based on additional evidence presented at the hearing.


Headnotes

[1] An appellant's failure to provide a transcript of an evidentiary hearing on a Rule 1.540 motion for relief from judgment requires an appellate court to presume the trial…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Without an adequate record of the proceedings below, this court cannot reasonably conclude that the trial court so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”

Citation to Estes v. Sassano regarding the necessity of an adequate record on appeal

Facts & Procedural History

A foreclosure judgment was entered in favor of One Seagrove Place Owners Association against the Bank of New York Mellon. More than one year after the…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

The Bank of New York Mellon appeals an order denying its motion to vacate a foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Appellee One Seagrove Place Owners Association. The Bank moved for relief from judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, alleging that the judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction based on improper service of process. The Bank argued that the Association’s affidavit of diligent search to support service of process by publication was legally insufficient. The trial court concluded that the judgment was voidable, not void, and because the Bank’s argument was raised more than one year after rendition of the final judgment, the court denied the Bank’s motion as untimely. We are constrained to affirm the trial court’s order because the Bank failed to provide a transcript of the hearing on its motion. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Estes v. Sassano, 47 So. 3d 383, 385 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Without an adequate record of the proceedings below, this court cannot reasonably conclude that the trial court so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”). Where a party moving under rule 1.540 sets forth a colorable claim for relief, the trial court is required to hold an evidentiary hearing. See Saloon Sao v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 109 So. 3d 896 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The Bank’s motion set forth a colorable claim, and the trial court held an evidentiary hearing. But the Bank furnished no transcript of the hearing in the appendix filed in this appeal. In the absence of a transcript, we must presume that the trial court’s order denying the Bank’s motion “was based on additional evidence adduced at the hearing.” Snowden v. Wells Fargo Bank, 172 So. 3d 506, 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We thus AFFIRM the order denying relief from the foreclosure judgment. LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________ Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; and William P. Heller and Henry H. Bolz of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. John M. Stratton of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, for Appellee One Seagrove Place Owners Association, Inc.; Michael J. Henry of Dunlap & Shipman, P.A., Santa Rosa Beach, for Appellee Inwood Investments, LLC.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw