STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
KEVIN RATLIFF
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Life sentences imposed on a juvenile for first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder are constitutional when the defendant is eligible for parole, notwithstanding Miller v. Alabama and Graham v. Florida.
[1] A life sentence for a juvenile offender is not unconstitutional under Miller v. …
[2] A prior appellate decision that has been quashed by the supreme court and remanded for reconsideration must be reconsidered in light of subsequent supreme court decisions…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKevin Ratliff was convicted of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder committed when he was a juvenile and received two life sentences.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Life Without Parole cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This case is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida, which quashed this court's opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018), and State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 1401 (2019). See State v. Ratliff, No. SC17-2037, 2019 WL 1983467, at *1 (Fla. May 3, 2019). We reverse.
The State appeals a postconviction order declaring unconstitutional two life sentences for the crimes of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder committed by Kevin Ratliff when he was a juvenile. The postconviction court granted relief under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), as interpreted in Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). However, in Franklin and Michel, the supreme court concluded that Atwell was wrongly decided.
Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1241; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 6-7. Because Ratliff is eligible for parole, his life sentences are not unconstitutional under Miller and Graham. See Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1241; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 6. We therefore reverse the postconviction court's order. Reversed.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2012)
- Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016)
- State v. Budry Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018)
- Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018)
- Phillips v. Mississippi., 139 S. Ct. 1401 (U.S. 2019)