STAFFORD B. BEACH AND JOHN B. BEACH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANNIE B. BEACH, DECEASED, APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ETC., ET AL., AND THE TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1962-10-24
No. 3041
KANNER, Acting C. J., SMITH, J., and WALLACE SAMPLE, Associate Judge, concur.
146 So. 2d 586 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See West Coast Lumber Co. v. Griffin, 1907, 54 Fla. 621, 45 So. 514; Williams v. Guthrie, 1931, 102 Fla. 1047, 137 So. 682; and Henry L. Doherty & Co. v. Joachim, 1941, 146 Fla. 50, 200 So. 238.

KANNER, Acting C. J., SMITH, J., and WALLACE SAMPLE, Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mendel v. Mendel, 257 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …rthought. The law which is applicable in this situation requires reversal of the money judgment against the husband. Eaton v. Eaton, Fla.App.1970, 238 So. 2d 166; Westberry v. Westberry, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 871; Kramer v. Kramer, Fla.App.1962, 146 So. 2d 586. The rules of law governing this case were well stated by the fourth district court of appeal in Eaton v. Eaton, supra, as follows: “Although a father does have the legal duty to support his minor children to the extent that his means reasonably pe…
  • Smith v. Farrell M. Smith, 197 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …chancellor was entitled to consider equitable defenses, such as a subsequent modification between the parties. See: Sackler v. Sackler, Fla.1950, 47 So. 2d 292, 18 A.L.R.2d 856; Haas v. Haas, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 640; Kramer v. Kramer, Fla.App.1962, 146 So. 2d 586. No [*17] error is found in the chancellor’s refusing to entertain the motion to modify by increasing the amount of support during the pendency of the case, because at the time it was presented the foreign decree had not been established in this Sta…
  • Helliwell v. The State of Fla. & the Trs. of the Internal Improvement Fund of Fla., 183 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
    …head Land Company [for Use and Benefit of River’s Edge] v. Hale, 145 Fla. 389, 199 So. 361 (1941); “Hayes v. Bowman, 91 So. 2d 795 ([Fla.] 1957); “Stafford B. Beach, et al., v. City of West Palm Beach and Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund, 146 So. 2d 586 [Fla.App.].” (Emphasis supplied) * * * * * * In the case of State ex rel. Ellis v. Gerbing, 1908, 56 Fla. 603, 47 So. 353, 22 L.R.A., N.S., 337, the Court held that lands within the limits of the state of Florida that are covered and uncovered by…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw