STATE, EX REL. ST. LUCIE COUNTY BANK
v.
ELWYN THOMAS, AS JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Fla. | 1935-01-29
Whitfield, C. J., and Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
118 Fla. 343 Florida Supreme Court (1935)
Also reported at: 159 So. 22

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court dismissed a mandamus proceeding because a subsequent order of disqualification by the respondent judge rendered the original controversy moot. The judge had initially disqualified himself, and then issued a new, supplemental order of disqualification based on his brother-in-law's election as a bank director, which was the subject of the appeal.


Holding

The Court held that the original controversy had become moot because a new and supplemental order of disqualification had been entered, which was not part of the current proceedings.


Key Quotes

“It appearing that the original order of disqualification which was attacked in this mandamus proceeding has been superseded by a new and different order of disqualification which is not involved in pleadings in this cause, and that thereby the original controversy involved in this proceeding as originally, instituted has became moot, it is thereupon ordered that the proceeding be and the same is hereby dismissed.”

This quote explains the court's reasoning for dismissing the case as moot.

Facts & Procedural History

The respondent Circuit Judge entered an order disqualifying himself from a case where St. Lucie County Bank was the defendant. The relator, St. Lucie …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The respondent Circuit Judge entered an order of disqualification which was attacked in this Court by an original proceeding in mandamus seeking to have the respondent Judge assume and take jurisdiction in a certain cause wherein Mayme N. McMullan, and others, were complainants, and St. Lucie County Bank, a corporation, was defendant, notwithstanding the order of disqualification upon authority of which the Circuit Judge had theretofore refused to proceed.

After the alternate writ had been issued, the respondent Judge made and entered in the cause referred to a new and supplemental order of disqualification under date of January 9, 1935, wherein he certified his disqualification to serve as Judge in said cause and declined to take jurisdiction therein because of the fact that certain stock in the St. Lucie County Bank had been issued to Edwin Colean, the husband of the Judge’s sister, and that on January 7, 1935, the said Edwin Colean was elected a Director of the defendant St. Lucie County Bank.

It appearing that the original order of disqualification which was attacked in this mandamus proceeding has been superseded by a new and different order of disqualification which is not involved in pleadings in this cause, and that thereby the original controversy involved in this proceeding as originally, instituted has became moot, it is thereupon ordered that the proceeding be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw