DELLANO
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of mandamus to compel a circuit court judge to rule on a motion fails when the motion has not been filed as a separate docket entry.
[1] A motion must be filed as a separate docket entry to require judicial consideration; attachment of a motion as an exhibit to other filings is insufficient to invoke a cou…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner Rolando Dellano sought a writ of mandamus to compel the circuit court to rule on a Motion to Withdraw Plea After Resentencing dated June 27…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Opening The Door (Evidentiary Rule) cases and more on FLexlaw
HENDON, J.
The petitioner, Rolando Dellano, filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, seeking issuance of a writ compelling the circuit court judge to rule on his “Motion to Withdraw Plea After Resentencing,” which the petitioner dated on June 27,
2018. Following our review of the lower tribunal docket and the information
provided by the petitioner, we deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus as it appears that the petitioner has not actually filed the Motion to Withdraw Plea After Sentencing as a separate docket entry.1 Denied.