BARBARA ANN KELLY
v.
SUNTRUST BANK
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order denying a motion that does not seek actual injunctive relief is not appealable under Florida appellate rules.
[1] An order denying a motion that does not seek actual injunctive relief is not appealable.
[2] A motion seeking a moratorium on court proceedings, filed after final judgment, does not constitute a request for injunctive relief.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“it is not an order which directs or precludes the party from taking a certain action outside of the lawsuit. Therefore, it is not properly appealed under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B).”
Citation to Loidl v. I & E Group, Inc., 927 So. 2d 1016, 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
Kelly sought an emergency motion for injunction requesting a moratorium to prohibit the trial court from acting in her foreclosure case, more than a y…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appealability Of Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Jeffrey E. Lewis, Judge.
May 16, 2019 PER CURIAM.
Barbara Kelly appeals an order denying her “emergency motion for injunction”—which sought a “moratorium” in her foreclosure case prohibiting the trial court from acting—even though final judgment had been granted in favor of SunTrust Bank over a year earlier. Because Kelly’s “emergency motion for injunction” did not actually seek injunctive relief, the order denying it is not appealable. See Loidl v. I & E Group, Inc., 927 So. 2d 1016, 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[I]t is not an order which directs or precludes the party from taking a certain action outside of the lawsuit. Therefore, it is not properly appealed under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B).”); cf. Stanfield v. Florida Dep’t of Children & Families, 698 So. 2d 321, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“[T]his order is an Injunction entered by the trial court because the effect and purpose of the order is to enjoin [the opposing party] from doing those acts enumerated in the order.”). We DISMISS Kelly’s appeal.
WOLF, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Barbara Ann Kelly, pro se, Appellant. Amelia Hallenberg Beard of McCalla, Raymer, Leibert, Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Katarina Loidl v. I & E Grp., Inc., 927 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
- Stanfield v. Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families & Guardian ad litem Program of Monroe Cnty., 698 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)