JASMINE CRANDALL
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must distinguish between jail credit and prison credit in the sentencing order, with prison credit to be calculated by the Department of Corrections.
[1] A sentencing order must distinguish between jail credit and prison credit, with the trial court permitted to award prison credit by checking the standard box without pers…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“This appears to be a scrivener's error that combines jail and prison credit. . . . The trial court need not calculate prison credit so long as the trial court checks the standard box allowing all appropriate prior prison credit.”
Court citing Rowan v. State regarding the proper treatment of combined jail and prison credit designations
Jasmine Crandall's probation was revoked and she received a sentence with a credit designation that combined jail and prison credit without distinguis…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JASMINE CRANDALL, DOC #T94085, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2721 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed April 24, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Nick Nazaretian, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of Ms. Crandall's probation and the resultant sentence without comment. Because the written sentence contains a single designation of credit ("Credit for Time Served: 72 Days (INCLUDING PRIOR PRISON CREDIT)") without delineating the jail credit to which she is entitled from the prison credit that the trial court also awarded, we remand only for the limited purpose of the entry of a new written sentence distinguishing between the jail and prison credit awards and clarifying that the calculation of the prison credit is to be calculated by the Department of
Corrections. See Rowan v. State, 779 So. 2d 417, 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("This appears to be a scrivener's error that combines jail and prison credit. . . . The trial court need not calculate prison credit so long as the trial court checks the standard box allowing all appropriate prior prison credit.").
Affirmed; remanded.
SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.