TYLER JAMES WHITHAM
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Tyler James Whitham pleaded no contest to improper exhibition of a firearm while reserving the right to appeal the denial of his Stand Your Ground motion to dismiss. The Second District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded for a new immunity hearing, holding that the 2017 amendment to Florida's Stand Your Ground statute shifting the burden of proof to the State applies retroactively to pending cases, even when the original immunity hearing occurred before the amendment's effective date.
The 2017 amendment to Florida's Stand Your Ground statute shifting the burden of proof to the State applies retroactively to cases pending on appeal, even when the immunity hearing was conducted before the amendment's effective date. The case is reversed and remanded for a new evidentiary hearing at which the State bears the burden of proof on the immunity question.
[1] The 2017 amendment to Florida's Stand Your Ground statute that shifted the burden of proof from the defendant to the State applies retroactively to cases pending on appea…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWhitham was originally charged with aggravated assault with a firearm but pleaded no contest to the reduced charge of improper exhibition of a firearm…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Improper Exhibition Of A Firearm cases and more on FLexlaw
KELLY, Judge.
Tyler James Whitham was originally charged with aggravated assault with a firearm. He pleaded no contest to the reduced charge of improper exhibition of a firearm, a first-degree misdemeanor, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss based on the Stand Your Ground statute, section 776.032, Florida Statutes (2018). In Martin v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1016, D1017 (Fla. 2d DCA May 4, 2018), this court held that the 2017 amendment to the statute that shifted the burden of proof to the State applied to cases pending on appeal even when the immunity hearing was held before the effective date of the statute. As was the case in Martin, the trial court here denied Mr. Whitham's motion to dismiss on the ground that he did not carry his burden of proof. Accordingly, we conclude that this case is controlled by Martin and that we are required to reverse for a new evidentiary hearing at which the State will have the burden of proof. See id. at D1018. If at the conclusion of the new immunity hearing the trial court determines that Mr. Whitham is entitled to immunity, it shall enter an order to that effect and dismiss the information with prejudice. Id.
Conversely, if it determines that he is not entitled to immunity, the court shall enter an order reflecting its findings and reinstate Mr. Whitham's conviction.
We acknowledge that our holding in Martin is in conflict with Love v. State, 247 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, No. SC18-747, 2018 WL 3147946 (Fla. June 26, 2018), and Hight v. State, 253 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), and accordingly certify the conflict.
Reversed and remanded with directions; conflict certified.
MORRIS and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Love v. State, 247 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
- Hight v. State, 253 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
- Catalano v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)