J.B., FATHER OF M.L.B., MINOR CHILD
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A father petitioned for certiorari review of a post-disposition dependency order that placed his minor child in the mother's sole custody and terminated protective services supervision. The court granted the petition in part, finding that the father was denied due process when the trial court terminated protective services supervision without providing him notice that the issue would be considered at the hearing.
The court granted certiorari relief and quashed the portion of the order terminating protective services supervision. The court held that due process in dependency proceedings requires fair notice and a real opportunity to be heard, neither of which was provided when the agency raised the termination issue orally without prior notice.
[1] In a dependency proceeding, termination of protective services supervision must be preceded by prior written notice to affected parties that the issue will be decided, an…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Due process in dependency proceedings requires 'fair notice and a real opportunity to be heard.'”
Statement of the applicable due process standard in dependency proceedings
The trial court held a hearing on custody and visitation in a dependency case. At that hearing, the agency orally raised the issue of terminating prot…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ore Tenus Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
April 11, 2019 RAY, J.
The father of M.L.B., a minor child, filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this Court seeking review of a post-disposition dependency order that placed the minor child in the sole custody of the child’s mother, modified the father’s visitation, and terminated protective services supervision. Of the issues presented, we find merit in the father’s argument that he was denied due process when the trial court terminated protective services supervision at a hearing for which the father was not given notice that the matter would be considered. We reject the father’s other arguments without further comment.
Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.345(b) provides that any party requesting termination of agency supervision must do so by written motion or in a written report to the court. No such request was filed in this case. Instead, the termination-of-services issue was first raised by the agency in an ore tenus motion at a hearing on custody and visitation. The court granted the requested relief, over the father’s objection.
Due process in dependency proceedings requires “fair notice and a real opportunity to be heard.” Dep’t of Children & Families v. T.S., 154 So. 3d 1223, 1226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Because neither was provided in this case, we grant certiorari relief and quash the portion of the order that terminates the agency’s protective services supervision. See R.H. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 948 So. 2d 898, 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (noting that it was error and a violation of a parent’s due process rights to terminate protective supervision without prior notice that the issue would be decided); A.W.P. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 10 So. 3d 134, 135–36 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (issuing a writ of certiorari in a dependency proceeding after finding the trial court violated a parent’s due process rights by failing to provide “notice and a real opportunity to be heard”).
DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
WETHERELL and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Jason A. Cobb, DeFuniak Springs, for Petitioner. Sarah J. Rumph of Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In the Interest of A.W.P., JR. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 10 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Dep't OF Child. & Families v. T.S., 154 So. 3d 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
- R.H. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 948 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)