REED
v.
REED
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that the appellant failed to provide an adequate record to demonstrate error and that challenges to findings were not preserved.
No, the appellant failed to provide an adequate record to demonstrate error, and issues regarding findings were not preserved.
[1] On appeal, the trial court's judgment carries a presumption of correctness, and the appellant bears the burden of presenting an adequate appellate record to demonstrate r…
[2] A challenge to the adequacy of trial court findings is treated as unpreserved error unless the appellant first brought the issue to the trial court's attention through a…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“in appellate proceedings, the trial court’s decision carries a presumption of correctness and, thus, the appellant has the burden to bring forth an adequate record to demonstrate error”
Establishes the standard of review and the appellant's burden on appeal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant, Jacob A. Reed, appealed a decision from the Volusia County Circuit Court. The appellee, Melissa Sexton Reed, did not appear for the app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nuisance Abatement cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JACOB A. REED, Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1120 MELISSA SEXTON REED, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 5, 2019 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Dawn D. Nichols, Judge.
Jacob A. Reed, Edgewater, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, in appellate proceedings, the trial court’s decision carries a presumption of correctness and, thus, the appellant has the burden to bring forth an adequate record to demonstrate error); Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2004) (treating the challenge to adequate findings as unpreserved error unless previously brought to the trial court’s attention in a motion for rehearing).
BERGER, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Somma v. Metra Elecs. Corp., 727 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Mathieu v. Kris Mathieu, 877 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)