WILLIAMS
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Trial courts have broad discretion in determining the relevance and admissibility of evidence, and such determinations will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.
[1] A trial court's evidentiary ruling will not be deemed an abuse of discretion where reasonable judges might well disagree on whether the evidence should have been admitted…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe opinion does not detail the underlying facts of the case.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Discretion Standard For Evidentiary Rulings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing: "All relevant evidence is admissible, except as provided by law"); § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing: "Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence"); Heath v. State, 648 So. 2d 660, 664 (Fla. 1994) (noting that a "trial court has broad discretion in determining the relevance of evidence and such determination will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion"); Knight v. State, 15 So. 3d 936, 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (observing that where reasonable trial judges might well disagree on whether certain evidence should have been admitted or excluded at trial, no abuse of discretion has been shown).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zaldivar v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- Heath v. State, 648 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 1994)
- Knight v. State, 15 So. 3d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)