A.M., FATHER OF N.M., A MINOR CHILD
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's judgment in the child welfare matter involving the Department of Children and Families and the minor child N.M. was proper and is affirmed.
A.M. appealed a circuit court decision regarding the Department of Children and Families' actions concerning his minor child N.M.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Opinion cases and more on FLexlaw
MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
2
Guy Victor Murray and Michael A. Tupper, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Ward L. Metzger, Natalie Clayton, and Margaret McLendon, Jacksonville, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Goldfarb and Thomasina F. Moore, Tallahassee, and Catherine M. Negaard, Jacksonville, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem.