MARK C. HARRIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order denying a Rule 3.800(a) claim without prejudice is nonfinal and not appealable.
[1] An order denying a Rule 3.800(a) claim without prejudice lacks finality and is not appealable.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHarris appealed from a circuit court order in Escambia County that denied one of his Rule 3.800(a) claims without prejudice.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800(A) Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
MARK C. HARRIS, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 1D2025-2886
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.
November 4, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Because the circuit court denied without prejudice one of Appellant's rule 3.800(a) claims, the order below is nonfinal and not appealable. DISMISSED. See Shelley v. State, 993 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (finding order lacked finality because the circuit court struck one of the claims as legally insufficient).
ROBERTS, NORDBY, and NEFF, JJ., concur.