MICHELE AMATO BIANCANIELLO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2026-10-29
No. 2025-2904
Smith, J., Makar, J., Lambert, J., Soud, J.
2026 FL 14624 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment was affirmed on appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

This is a criminal case involving Michele Amato Biancaniello and the State of Florida, originating from St. Johns County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2025-2904 LT Case No. 2024-001722-CF-MA

MICHELE AMATO BIANCANIELLO, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County.

R. Lee Smith, Judge.

Michael C. Nappi, Chief Assistant Regional Counsel, and Lori D. Loftis, Chief Assistant Regional Counsel, of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Michele Amato Biancaniello, Ponce Inlet, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 29, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, LAMBERT, and SOUD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw