MICHAEL SENECA
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's denial of a Rule 3.800 motion is affirmed when the motion lacks sufficient grounds for relief.
Michael Seneca appealed from an order denying his Rule 3.800 motion in a criminal case from Broward County Circuit Court.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MICHAEL SENECA, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2026-2269
[October 29, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 061998CF005044A88810.
Michael Seneca, Indiantown, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, SHEPHERD and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *