DANIEL JOSEPH GRESHAM
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-10-29
No. 2026-0866
Haimes, J., Forst, J., Shaw, J., Lott, J.
2026 FL 14604 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court's denial of a rule 3.800 motion is affirmed when the motion lacks sufficient grounds to warrant relief.


Facts & Procedural History

Daniel Joseph Gresham appealed an order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County denying his rule 3.800 motion, w…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL JOSEPH GRESHAM, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0866

[October 29, 2026]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062010CA015398AXXXCE.

Daniel Joseph Gresham, Plantation, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FORST, SHAW and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw