RONILDE TUMBARELL PREVOST, ET AL.
v.
BERNARDO SEVERINO

Fla. 3d DCA | 2026-10-29
No. 2025-0803
Logue, J., Gordo, J., Lobree, J., Ruiz, J.
2026 FL 14572 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment in favor of the appellee was proper and is affirmed on appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

Ronilde Tumbarell Prevost and others appealed a judgment entered against them in favor of Bernardo Severino in a civil action in Miami-Dade County Cir…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 29, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-0803 Lower Tribunal No. 20-3105-CA-01

Ronilde Tumbarell Prevost, et al., Appellants,

vs.

Bernardo Severino, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Llopiz Wizel LLP, and Joan Carlos Wizel and Onier Llopiz, (Fort Lauderdale); Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Bridget Gonzalez, David Caballero, Trevor L. Whitlow and Fracesca M. Stein, for appellants.

Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend, and Bonnie M. Sack and Daniel S. Weinger (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw