CHAD TAYLOR
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court properly denies a Rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence and may prohibit a party from filing pro se motions when the motion lacks merit.
[1] A trial court may prohibit a party from filing pro se motions when such filings lack merit, provided that such prohibition does not preclude the party from challenging a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChad Taylor appealed a nonfinal order and an order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentenc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Non-Final Order Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
CHAD TAYLOR, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2026-0759 [October 28, 2026]
Appeal of nonfinal order and order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CF010286AXXXMB.
Glenn H. Mitchell, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's orders that denied appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence and prohibited him from any future pro se filings. We note that the prohibition does not preclude appellant from challenging his Prison Releasee Reoffender sentence, if appropriate, following the Florida Supreme Court's disposition of State v. Lewars, 259 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 2018).
LEVINE, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *