RITA MARANGONI
v.
ESTATE OF QUINTO A. MARANGONI A/K/A QUINT A. MARANGONI, JEANNE M. DINICOLA, AND ROBERT Q. MARANGONI
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se petitioner whose filings are repetitive, frivolous, and abusive may be warned that further such filings will result in sanctions including prohibition of future pro se filings.
[1] A pro se litigant whose filings in an appellate court are repetitive, frivolous, and abusive may be warned that further such filings will result in sanctions, including p…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRita Marangoni filed a petition for writ of prohibition in the Fifth District Court of Appeal arising from a Volusia County Circuit Court probate case…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Prohibition cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2026-2480 LT Case No. 64-2026-CP-010142
RITA MARANGONI,
Petitioner,
v.
ESTATE OF QUINTO A.
MARANGONI a/k/a QUINT A.
MARANGONI, JEANNE M.
DINICOLA, and ROBERT Q. MARANGONI,
Respondents.
Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Linda Lundman Gaustad, Respondent Judge. Rita Marangoni, Evans, pro se. No Appearance for Respondents.
October 26, 2026
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously denied Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition arising from Volusia County Circuit Court Case No. 64- 2026-CP-010142. Because Petitioner's filings in this Court related to that case appear to be repetitive, frivolous, and abusive,
Petitioner is cautioned that any further frivolous or abusive pro se filings in this Court arising from that circuit court case may result in sanctions, including a prohibition against future pro se filings in this Court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.