DOOR FACTORY, INC. AND EDUARD SIKAR
v.
PCHR DEVELOPMENT, INC. AND SERGUEI ZAKREPINE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-10-22
No. 2026-0259
Frink, J., May, J., Shepherd, J., Shaw, J.
2026 FL 14237 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment in favor of the appellees was affirmed on appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

Door Factory, Inc. and Eduard Sikar appealed a judgment entered by the trial court in favor of PCHR Development, Inc. and Serguei Zakrepine in a case …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOOR FACTORY, INC. and EDUARD SIKAR, Appellants,

v.

PCHR DEVELOPMENT, INC. and SERGUEI ZAKREPINE, Appellees.

No. 4D2026-0259

[October 22, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062023CA017760AXXXCE.

Victor K. Rones of Law Offices of Victor K. Rones, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Andre G. Raikhelson of Law Offices of Andre G. Raikhelson, LLC, Boca Raton, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, SHEPHERD and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw