JORGE LUIS CARDENAS-BETANCOURT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Any defect in the charging information is cured by a defendant's plea to the charge and waiver of procedural objections.
[1] Any defect in charging information is cured by a defendant's plea to the charge.
[2] A defendant's waiver of procedural and due process objections made on the record as part of a plea is valid.
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJorge Luis Cardenas-Betancourt appealed his conviction from Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, challenging the charging information.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed October 22, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D26-1799
Lower Tribunal No. F25-2598A
Jorge Luis Cardenas-Betancourt,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge.
Martin Beguiristain, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ryan David Brazner,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER, and REBULL, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bradley v. State, 3 So. 3d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 2009) (any
defect in the charging information is cured by plea to the charge); Lemos v.
State, 431 So. 3d 599, 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 2026) (affirming waiver of
procedural and due process objections where defense counsel did so on the
record as part of the plea); State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1989)
(affirming oral amendment of information to which defendant agreed).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1989)
- Bradley v. State, 3 So. 3d 1168 (Fla. 2009)
- Lemos v. State, 431 So. 3d 599 (Fla. 5th DCA 2026)