EDWIN BURNARD JOHNSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2026-10-22
No. 2024-1575
Logue, J., Miller, J., Gooden, J., Cruz, J.
2026 FL 14201 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court's denial of special jury instructions is reviewed for abuse of discretion and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court's denial of special jury instructions is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Edwin Burnard Johnson appealed a conviction from Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, challenging the trial court's refusal to grant special jury instruct…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 22, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-1575 Lower Tribunal No. F21-8867

Edwin Burnard Johnson, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ryan Schelwat and Camilo Montoya, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER, and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wilson v. State, 410 So. 3d 548, 565 (Fla. 2025) (“A trial court's denial of special jury instructions is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”

(quoting Snelgrove v. State, 107 So. 3d 242, 255 (Fla. 2012))); Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44, 45 (Fla. 1974) (“A defendant, in moving for a judgment of acquittal, admits not only the facts stated in the evidence adduced, but also admits every conclusion favorable to the adverse party that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence.").

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw