CARLOS PALMER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-10-21
No. 2025-2252
Rowe, J., Forst, J., Shepherd, J., Shaw, J.
2026 FL 14088 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Florida's use of a six-person jury in criminal trials does not violate the defendant's constitutional rights and is permissible under longstanding precedent.


Headnotes

[1] A six-person jury in a criminal trial for attempted premeditated first-degree murder is constitutionally permissible under Florida law and longstanding precedent.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Carlos Palmer was convicted of attempted premeditated first-degree murder with a firearm in Palm Beach County Circuit Court and appealed his convictio…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CARLOS PALMER, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2252

[October 21, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502023CF002385AXXXMB.

Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Ethan R. Goldberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted premeditated first-degree murder with a firearm. He raises three issues on appeal. We affirm the circuit court's use of a six-person jury given longstanding precedent. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), rev. denied, No. SC22-1597, 2023 WL 3830251 (Fla. June 6, 2023); Cunningham v. Florida, 144 S. Ct. 1287 (2024) (denying petition for writ of certiorari challenging Florida's use of six-member juries). But see Kian v. State, 421 So. 3d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025), cert. granted, 146 S. Ct. 2732 (2026). We affirm all other issues without discussion.

Affirmed.

FORST, SHEPHERD and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw